122 p/flops of processing power vs. the now second place of 93 p/flops.
I'd love to run Excel and Power Query on this monster!US supercomputer knocks out Chinese champ to reclaim HPC crown
But China has more machines overall in the TOP500 list.
![EvilGrin :evilgrin:](./images/smilies/evilgrin.gif)
![ROFL :rofl:](./images/smilies/rofl.gif)
I'd love to run Excel and Power Query on this monster!US supercomputer knocks out Chinese champ to reclaim HPC crown
But China has more machines overall in the TOP500 list.
HansV wrote:Calculations would finish before you even started them...
You mean a bit like...HansV wrote:Calculations would finish before you even started them...
A bit like the Imp-powered devices of the DiscworldJay Freedman wrote:All those boxes are just for show. In the back corner there's a little old man who's very good with an abacus.
Yes, but that took a rather larger computer, as described by Slartibartfast.Argus wrote:But we already know the answer, don't we? It's 42.
Yes, but ...Rudi wrote:.I'd love to run Excel and Power Query on this monster!
Extending your thoughts Ken ... what would happen if indeed you arrived before you left and then decided you didn't want to leavestuck wrote: You mean a bit like...
There was a young man called Bright
Who could travel much faster than light
He left one day
In a relative way
And arrived the previous night
Ken
"You can log off any time you likeRonH wrote:Extending your thoughts Ken ... what would happen if indeed you arrived before you left and then decided you didn't want to leave
John Gray wrote: "You can log off any time you like
But you can never leave..."
Hotel California, The Eagles
I'm quite sure you never got that message on the 1401... considering that the 1401 was withdrawn from the market in 1971 and Excel was released (on Macintosh) in 1985.ChrisGreaves wrote:Yes, but ...Rudi wrote:.I'd love to run Excel and Power Query on this monster!
You'd still end up staring at a message box that read "Microsoft Excel has stopped responding ..."![]()
If memory serves me well, the IBM 1401 had a basic program instruction cycle of 11.5 microseconds, and we NEVER got that annoying message ...
Cheers
Chris