GeoffW wrote: ↑28 Sep 2024, 15:09
I still get the old format ABC News, with the option to view the new format. It appears to have the same news (based on a cursory view) despite the much changed look and feel.
Thanks for all of this, Geoff.
I am curious: How do you obtain the old format of ABC? I found the format up until August too be image-bloated. Do you have access to an even older format?
Daily I read Australian, UK(BBC and BBC World) and CNN. I have Google searches for Bonavista, SA and WA, complete with filters ("-dailymail -msn -yahoo") which work well enough for me to browse.
I find it useful to check a News site for bias and factual checking using mediabiasfactcheck.com - The Conversation (suggested by Ron) rates it as more accurate and centre of the spectrum than ABC News Australia - which still rates as quite accurate and moderately left of centre.
Bias is as Bias does, I guess. I do not know whether I am "left" or "right". Pulling back a bit I like to read the first two paragraphs and then decide whether they seem to know what they are talking about, or whether it is click-bait.
In this matter I am more concerned about how much raw data I can feed into the hopper (my mind) rather than the quality; I'll let my mind filter out the dross.
Other news sites which you may consider are The Guardian and AP News (both a little more left, and not quite as accurate) . In favour of The Guardian there are versions which cover news from different countries, mostly US, UK and Australia. The Guardian, despite carrying advertising, has, instead of a paywall, a nagfence.
![ThankYou :thankyou:](./images/smilies/thankyou.gif)
I have added APNews to my menu, but it too has more images than I care for now that I have seen CNN-LITE.
I can clarify now. On a news "splash"or introductory page I'd like pure-text summary. By all means give me an image on the linked pages of detail, but I want to make a text-based decision before reading the specific article. In a sense the headlines are important to me before I have an interest in the details.
Thanks again, Chris