Yet another story of an Australian animal - in a Christmas tree
-
- PlatinumLounger
- Posts: 4047
- Joined: 24 Jan 2010, 07:23
-
- UraniumLounger
- Posts: 9265
- Joined: 13 Feb 2010, 01:27
- Location: Deep in the Heart of Texas
Re: Yet another story of an Australian animal - in a Christmas tree
So, this must be the year of the koala, then, eh?
Bob's yer Uncle
Dell Intel Core i5 Laptop, 3570K,1.60 GHz, 8 GB RAM, Windows 11 64-bit, LibreOffice,and other bits and bobs
(1/2)(1+√5) |
-
- PlatinumLounger
- Posts: 4047
- Joined: 24 Jan 2010, 07:23
Re: Yet another story of an Australian animal - in a Christmas tree
I don't think this year has been the year of the koala drink however.
It hasn't been a koala tea year.
It hasn't been a koala tea year.
-
- PlutoniumLounger
- Posts: 15585
- Joined: 24 Jan 2010, 23:23
- Location: brings.slot.perky
Re: Yet another story of an Australian animal - in a Christmas tree
While we should raise praise that no-one (as yet) has called Daphne a "Koala Bear", we should be aware of at least one of the Related Stories (same page!) Jeers
Chris
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
There's nothing heavier than an empty water bottle
-
- gamma jay
- Posts: 25455
- Joined: 17 Mar 2010, 17:33
- Location: Cape Town
Re: Yet another story of an Australian animal - in a Christmas tree
I'm dumbstruck how they could have missed that!
Regards,
Rudi
If your absence does not affect them, your presence didn't matter.
Rudi
If your absence does not affect them, your presence didn't matter.
-
- PlutoniumLounger
- Posts: 15585
- Joined: 24 Jan 2010, 23:23
- Location: brings.slot.perky
Re: Yet another story of an Australian animal - in a Christmas tree
I blame it all on this internet advertising. It's everywhere. Almost every page I open, there's advertising. I can't stand it!..
No, sorry, hang about, I went a bit off the tracks there.
Let's start again.
I blame it all on these computers. Everything is computerized nowadays.
Even plagiarism.
The computerization, or rather handing over tasks to computers, is part of the problem. When a programmer's algorithm has to decide what stories are "related", even the best of us (Ahem!) lands in trouble.
There is, in short, not only a serious lack of human proofreading, but in terms of aggregated news (when a "page of news" is a kaleidoscope window) a near-impossibility of human proofreading.
Cheers
Chris
There's nothing heavier than an empty water bottle