The Jellyfish Nebula

User avatar
Graeme
Cosmic Lounger
Posts: 1552
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 12:23
Location: Medway, Kent, UK

The Jellyfish Nebula

Post by Graeme »

The Jellyfish Nebula, IC443 in Gemini, a Supernova Remanent.

Captured 04/03/25. 90xL 25xRGB @ 4 minutes, 11 Hours total

An unprecedented week of clear nights allowed imaging sessions on five nights in a row! Three of those ended prematurely with only a couple of hours of photons captured before the 99% humidity ended the session for the night. My longest ever exposure but still quite a dim target. The bright star is Propus, Castor's left ankle.

IC443_EL.jpg
Higher Res
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
_______________________________________

http://www.averywayobservatory.co.uk/

User avatar
HansV
Administrator
Posts: 80207
Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 00:14
Status: Microsoft MVP
Location: Wageningen, The Netherlands

Re: The Jellyfish Nebula

Post by HansV »

Great!
Best wishes,
Hans

User avatar
ChrisGreaves
PlutoniumLounger
Posts: 16919
Joined: 24 Jan 2010, 23:23
Location: brings.slot.perky

Re: The Jellyfish Nebula

Post by ChrisGreaves »

Graeme wrote:
12 Mar 2025, 20:34
Captured 04/03/25. 90xL 25xRGB @ 4 minutes, 11 Hours total
Another nice one, Graeme.
Let's see if I've got the hang of this:-
Your equipment is programmed to take several - hundreds? of - images of whatever it is you are trying to capture, and then, presumably after clearing some of the images - dropping images that have a satellite track - you stack them all together, much as I used to stack twenty-punched cards to check that all cards had the same result. (In my younger days I found it hard to believe that a computer could invert a matrix twenty times in a row and get the same answer every time.)

I read this morning that the number of detected moons of Saturn has - roughly - doubled, and Saturn now beats Jupiter in number-of-moons.
Also that Saturn is pretty well exhausted in terms of detecting small satellites by enhancing their illumination by stacking.

To a first-order of magnitude, are you doing what the Saturn team were doing - using stacking as an effective time-exposure?
Thanks, Chris
Never panic in a room that holds a computer.

User avatar
stuck
Panoramic Lounger
Posts: 8777
Joined: 25 Jan 2010, 09:09
Location: retirement

Re: The Jellyfish Nebula

Post by stuck »

That's a really good photo, very impressive.

:thumbup: :thumbup:

Ken

User avatar
Graeme
Cosmic Lounger
Posts: 1552
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 12:23
Location: Medway, Kent, UK

Re: The Jellyfish Nebula

Post by Graeme »

Thanks Hans, Chris and Ken.

Yes, using stacking reduces noise. If you image a faint target in any sort of photography and use a long exposure to collect enough photons to produce an image then you would also capture long exposure noise. So if you take lots of shorter exposures the target is captured and the noise averages out giving a much better signal to noise ratio.

More detail here:

https://www.lifepixel.com/photo-tutoria ... le%20frame.
_______________________________________

http://www.averywayobservatory.co.uk/