Proposal to Summarize Long Threads

User avatar
ChrisGreaves
PlutoniumLounger
Posts: 15498
Joined: 24 Jan 2010, 23:23
Location: brings.slot.perky

Proposal to Summarize Long Threads

Post by ChrisGreaves »

I went looking for Parental Controls today and found a thread started on January 11th 2011 by none other than me. To my horror the thread is nine pages long.
I don’t have the time :evilgrin: to wade through nine pages and ferret out the simple way to implement this, so I thought we (which is to say, you) should support a system whereby the initiator of a long thread might accept responsibility to build a single post with one, or two, levels:-
(1) A quick-start brain-dead easy-implementation solution to give the reader a feel for what the thread tries to accomplish and
(2) A step-by-step path to the complete process (with links to other posts in the thread for the screenshots, Traps for Young Players etc.) for those who want to achieve the pinnacle of success reached by Hans/Rudi/Andy/et al..

It is obvious to me that unless I am careful I shall be nominated, and possibly elected, to run through my nine pages and provide the quick-start and complete-process text to show you all what can be done.

OK. I volunteer to summarize the Jan 11 2011 thread.(1)

Before I procrastinate :evilgrin: , I’d appreciate hearing comments and suggestions as to how we might adopt this suggestion in a semi-formal manner.

(1) At what time might a moderator suggest to the thread originator that a summary would be a good idea?

(2) How might we have a second member run through the proposed summary post to make sure that its one or two methods function correctly?

(3) Is the summary post always relegated to the end of the thread (near Page 10 in my case), or can it go anywhere as long as a link is made from the first post at the head of the thread?

(4) The “parental controls” thread lends itself to my suggested two-level solutions suggestion, but what other types of summary might be required for lengthy threads?

(5) The moderators’ decision to summarize can include a decision based on whether the length of the thread is mainly due to hijacking with social or light comment (I am guilty of this, I know)

(6) Other thoughts?

Thanks
Chris
(1) While realising that if THIS thread is successfully long ...
C
An expensive day out: Wallet and Grimace

User avatar
Argus
GoldLounger
Posts: 3081
Joined: 24 Jan 2010, 19:07

Re: Proposal to Summarize Long Threads

Post by Argus »

Good luck with that; some, ahem, can't decide which solution to use, if any.

[Before reading past the first few sentences]
OK, when you have read the 9 pages and done what you propose above. :evilgrin:

I think the lounge is too small for this level of sophistication.
Byelingual    When you speak two languages but start losing vocabulary in both of them.

User avatar
HansV
Administrator
Posts: 78236
Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 00:14
Status: Microsoft MVP
Location: Wageningen, The Netherlands

Re: Proposal to Summarize Long Threads

Post by HansV »

I agree with Argus - this is not going to happen.
Best wishes,
Hans

jstevens
GoldLounger
Posts: 2618
Joined: 26 Jan 2010, 16:31
Location: Southern California

Re: Proposal to Summarize Long Threads

Post by jstevens »

Chris,

Out of curiosity, which thread has the most pages?
Regards,
John

User avatar
John Gray
PlatinumLounger
Posts: 5401
Joined: 24 Jan 2010, 08:33
Location: A cathedral city in England

Re: Proposal to Summarize Long Threads

Post by John Gray »

Chris: surely the solution is for you to write many fewer words...? :thankyou:
(I always think that you are unnecessarily prolix!)
John Gray

Venison is quiet deer, and quite dear.

User avatar
HansV
Administrator
Posts: 78236
Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 00:14
Status: Microsoft MVP
Location: Wageningen, The Netherlands

Re: Proposal to Summarize Long Threads

Post by HansV »

@jstevens: the topic (thread) with the highest number of replies is Xmas Word Association Game from 202, with 555 replies.
#2 is Best FREE Software (Used and Rated by Loungers) with 327 replies.

I wouldn't like to summarize either!
Best wishes,
Hans

User avatar
BobH
UraniumLounger
Posts: 9216
Joined: 13 Feb 2010, 01:27
Location: Deep in the Heart of Texas

Re: Proposal to Summarize Long Threads

Post by BobH »

The Free Software thread has come up twice today and reminds me of a question I've had for awhile now.

Is there a simple, easy way to create a way to query this information? I was thinking that one might wish to search for a certain type of product, a product by name, or by publisher name.

It's been too long since I've used Excel to remember how one does this or if it is even possible. On occasion, I have resorted to opening the file in Excel and sorting by column to find information but I sometimes get ranges wrong and make other errors. An approach that enforced a search discipline would be nice, I think.

:cheers: :chocciebar: :thankyou:
Bob's yer Uncle
(1/2)(1+√5)
Intel Core i5, 3570K, 3.40 GHz, 16 GB RAM, ECS Z77 H2-A3 Mobo, Windows 10 >HPE 64-bit, MS Office 2016

User avatar
HansV
Administrator
Posts: 78236
Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 00:14
Status: Microsoft MVP
Location: Wageningen, The Netherlands

Re: Proposal to Summarize Long Threads

Post by HansV »

The workbook in the first post of the Best FREE Software thread is from 2016, but it covers most of the thread (more than 15 of its 17 pages). You can easily sort the table by column C (App Type), or filter this column. When you want to sort, click in a cell of the column; do not select the entire column.
Best wishes,
Hans

User avatar
Doc.AElstein
BronzeLounger
Posts: 1499
Joined: 28 Feb 2015, 13:11
Location: Hof, Bayern, Germany

Re: Proposal to Summarize Long Threads

Post by Doc.AElstein »

I think your idea Chris is basically sound.
But my 2 cents is that the amount of Threads appropriate for such treatment is relatively too small to warrant a formal or even semi formal approach.
I think in my 5 years or so as a regular in a dozen or so places, I can think of some Threads from me, you, and just a few other people that could benefit from the such. It is a miniscule number compared to the mass of more shorter Threads
As a Moderator for a couple of years I only once did something along the lines of what you are suggesting , ( or rather a few times for the same OP’s Threads). But I was partly responsible for the Monster Threads since the guy ( a currently absent friend of ours here ) had nigh on a hundred Threads all very similar. As I took it on myself to merge them down to about half a dozen I thought I would add a first post index in them , ( as well as a warning to the world in general about the extraordinary phenomena that that OP was/ is!) But once again, that was an exception. ( I wouldn’t like to think that on this planet there was more than one OP like that one… )
_.____
I think maybe the odd occasion that something like you suggest could be useful to do, somebody doing it without a formal set of guidelines on doing it is OK.
_.___
Occasionally I have added a short edit at the first post of some older Threads of mine, for example to point at the post which might be close to a simplified section / solution. But in doing that I think it is important to note that its often regarded as good posting practice not to edit any post too much , once the post has replies, so as not to make following posts appear a bit out of sync with the general run of the Thread.
_.____
But you keep the long posts going, Chris. Down with the short message mentality and post size limit I say :) :evilgrin: . Just my opinion ;) , that’s all :) :smile:

Alan
I am having difficulty logging in with this account just now.
You can find me at DocAElstein also

User avatar
ChrisGreaves
PlutoniumLounger
Posts: 15498
Joined: 24 Jan 2010, 23:23
Location: brings.slot.perky

Re: Proposal to Summarize Long Threads

Post by ChrisGreaves »

ChrisGreaves wrote:
15 Aug 2020, 11:02
... a system whereby the initiator of a long thread might accept responsibility to build a single post with one, or two, levels:-
Proposal to Summarize Long Threads
I am summarizing my replies to posts in this thread to date as I did in this post. I see this as a way of reducing the number of posts in a thread and bringing the status of the thread to a convergent point. Just another way of summarizing data.

Chris> … the initiator of a long thread might accept responsibility to build a single post with one, or two, levels. I’d appreciate hearing comments and suggestions as to how we might adopt this suggestion in a semi-formal manner.

In my post I suggested “accept responsibility”, with no compulsion. I did ask for comments and suggestions and am grateful for these. As well I suggested a semi-formal manner; that is, that there might be a recommended structure (of summaries) for anyone inclined to generate a summary,.

Argus> Good luck with that; some, ahem, can't decide which solution to use, if any. [Before reading past the first few sentences] OK, when you have read the 9 pages and done what you propose above. I think the lounge is too small for this level of sophistication.

Quite so. In many a long thread there are branches of thought, some profitable, some not so much. Each new reader coming across the thread must travel each branch and discover it to be (possibly) a dead-end or fruitless path. As for level of sophistication, if it was good enough for Rudi, it’s good enough for me,

HansV> I agree with Argus - this is not going to happen.

But it has happened in the past. Here I am suggesting that a few guidelines might help users in summarizing threads.

jstevens (John)> Out of curiosity, which thread has the most pages?

Good question, and “pages” or “posts” or even “screens” all serve as valid units of measurement, but they do not eliminate the “fluff” in all its various forms. Whether a thread is 50% images (blows up the number of pages) or 50% hijacking banter (blows up the number of posts), or what, a one-post summary of the technique that seems to be generally acceptable as a solution is the best bet.

HansV> @jstevens: the topic (thread) with the highest number of replies is Xmas Word Association Game from 202, with 555 replies. #2 is Best FREE Software (Used and Rated by Loungers) with 327 replies. I wouldn't like to summarize either!

Me either! But there again, providing a single post that short-circuits all the fluff/dead-ends is surely a valuable post, and whether we/I like it or not, it is surely valuable work.

John Gray> Chris: surely the solution is for you to write many fewer words...? (I always think that you are unnecessarily prolix!)

Fewer words would help, but then I sometimes add detail for the future reader, or novice, who may not yet be up on the jargon. I was once mystified by RC and IMNSHO.. And yes, I am prolix, and do write “a lot”, but I love writing, and it’s hard being a lonely old man living on top of a hill on a wind-swept peninsula, miles from civilization and … (see what I mean?!!)

Doc.AElstein (Alan)> I think your idea Chris is basically sound. But my 2 cents is that the amount of Threads appropriate for such treatment is relatively too small to warrant a formal or even semi formal approach. I think maybe the odd occasion that something like you suggest could be useful to do, somebody doing it without a formal set of guidelines on doing it is OK. Down with the short message mentality and post size limit I say :) . Just my opinion ;) , that’s all :)

It is not the amount/number of threads that matters. When I/we come across a long thread, multiple pages, that we need to wade through to find the nugget, why not then post the nugget as a summary? It should save the next person(s) wading through the mire. And yes, doing it without guidelines is OK (and legal and admirable), but if someone does suggest a guideline, why not work with that existing standard? I must confess that some longer comments give me food for thought and often enough remind me that I am human.

Cheers
Chris
An expensive day out: Wallet and Grimace

User avatar
Rebel
4StarLounger
Posts: 557
Joined: 24 Jan 2010, 16:02
Location: Recently moved to Bracebridge - in the heart of Muskoka.

Re: Proposal to Summarize Long Threads

Post by Rebel »

Would this be an acceptable summary for this thread regarding a "Proposal to Summarize Long Threads":
HansV wrote:
15 Aug 2020, 11:39
I agree with Argus - this is not going to happen.
:evilgrin: :innocent:
John :canada:
A Child's Mind, Once Stretched by Imagination...
Never Regains Its Original Dimensions

User avatar
Doc.AElstein
BronzeLounger
Posts: 1499
Joined: 28 Feb 2015, 13:11
Location: Hof, Bayern, Germany

Re: Proposal to Summarize Long Threads

Post by Doc.AElstein »

ChrisGreaves wrote:
18 Aug 2020, 18:32
....I must confess that some longer comments give me food for thought and often enough remind me that I am human.
An interesting timely comment…. I was asked just recently to help track down a possible comment/question posting Bot , or one that someone is trying to develop, that is doing some awkward damage… The problem is that some of the short replies are very believable, but a longer reply attempt is usually more revealing…
We believe the learning algorithm of this Bot is getting its food from the current mass of forum short questions and short answers.
Its quite frightening.
I am having difficulty logging in with this account just now.
You can find me at DocAElstein also

PJ_in_FL
5StarLounger
Posts: 1090
Joined: 21 Jan 2011, 16:51
Location: Florida

Re: Proposal to Summarize Long Threads

Post by PJ_in_FL »

Rebel wrote:
18 Aug 2020, 22:01
Would this be an acceptable summary for this thread regarding a "Proposal to Summarize Long Threads":
HansV wrote:
15 Aug 2020, 11:39
I agree with Argus - this is not going to happen.
:evilgrin: :innocent:
I second that!
PJ in (usually sunny) FL

User avatar
viking33
PlatinumLounger
Posts: 5685
Joined: 24 Jan 2010, 19:16
Location: Cape Cod, Massachusetts,USA

Re: Proposal to Summarize Long Threads

Post by viking33 »

Chris, I think your last post is similar to the thread itself, that you mention ....too long!
BOB
:massachusetts: :usa:
______________________________________

If I agreed with you we'd both be wrong.

User avatar
ChrisGreaves
PlutoniumLounger
Posts: 15498
Joined: 24 Jan 2010, 23:23
Location: brings.slot.perky

Re: Proposal to Summarize Long Threads

Post by ChrisGreaves »

viking33 wrote:
20 Aug 2020, 18:16
Chris, I think your last post is similar to the thread itself, that you mention ....too long!
Hi Bob. Yes, the summary is a long post, but look at it as a single post completely (I hope accurately) summarizing something, instead of the same material spread over seven or eight individual posts from the same person responding to seven or eight other people.

In this summary I was trying to set down my thoughts after a couple of days careful consideration of responses. In that sense I think it is a good summary.

The summary proposed for the thread started on January 11th 2011 might end up the same length as this summary (above) BUT it would condense nine pages into a screen. And it should eliminate dead-ends and the like. A net saving for whoever comes across the thread in future.

The fact that no-one (including me) wants to summarize nine pages suggests that no-one wants to, or will, read the thread in the future.

A forum with threads that pop up in searches but "can't be read" is not a useful as it might be.

Cheers
Chris
An expensive day out: Wallet and Grimace

User avatar
Argus
GoldLounger
Posts: 3081
Joined: 24 Jan 2010, 19:07

Re: Proposal to Summarize Long Threads

Post by Argus »

I agree with you there, Chris.

A first small step, that just about every forum I've encountered often lack, is feedback from the OP. I.e. did suggested solutions work. We often see that here, which is great and obviously more often seen in smaller forums.

We also have very kind and tolerant administrators,* at other places moderators might step into a thread and urge people to stay on topic.

I've no problem with long posts if they are a genuine attempt to help from one user to another. (There can also be fifty-elven lines of code in an office file, most people don't see, and just a short reply: "check this file".)

(BTW, xkcd suggests a sticky-post for the people of the future ... :))

* Do I get a cookie now?
Byelingual    When you speak two languages but start losing vocabulary in both of them.

PJ_in_FL
5StarLounger
Posts: 1090
Joined: 21 Jan 2011, 16:51
Location: Florida

Re: Proposal to Summarize Long Threads

Post by PJ_in_FL »

ChrisGreaves wrote:
20 Aug 2020, 19:58
viking33 wrote:
20 Aug 2020, 18:16
Chris, I think your last post is similar to the thread itself, that you mention ....too long!
Hi Bob. Yes, the summary is a long post, but look at it as a single post completely (I hope accurately) summarizing something, instead of the same material spread over seven or eight individual posts from the same person responding to seven or eight other people.

...

Cheers
Chris
But Chris, soon it will devolve into discussions of who is summarizing and what they're are leaving out due to any supposed biases. We DO NOT want to go there!!!! :grin:
Last edited by PJ_in_FL on 21 Aug 2020, 13:00, edited 1 time in total.
PJ in (usually sunny) FL

GeoffW
PlatinumLounger
Posts: 4023
Joined: 24 Jan 2010, 07:23

Re: Proposal to Summarize Long Threads

Post by GeoffW »

Being winter Down Under, I'd be happy for somebody to summerize.

User avatar
John Gray
PlatinumLounger
Posts: 5401
Joined: 24 Jan 2010, 08:33
Location: A cathedral city in England

Re: Proposal to Summarize Long Threads

Post by John Gray »

Chris: have you ever thought of summarising what you post before you post it, rather than after?
During English lessons at skool we often had to précis pieces of text to extract the salient points therefrom in a more-condensed form... :thumbup:
John Gray

Venison is quiet deer, and quite dear.

User avatar
DaveA
GoldLounger
Posts: 2599
Joined: 24 Jan 2010, 15:26
Location: Olympia, WA

Re: Proposal to Summarize Long Threads

Post by DaveA »

Now, I think that Chris is looking for something to do. :flee:
He can spend his time Summarizing the Lonnnnng posts during the cold Canadian winters. :flatcat:
I think he just may be the person to do it! :wartgun:
I am so far behind, I think I am First :evilgrin:
Genealogy....confusing the dead and annoying the living