Great photo of a train derailment

[ChrisGreaves]

Toronto Star
I am, of course, fascinated more by the statement that contains in part "... in a 1.6 kilometre square area ...".
Up here in the Frozen North we are metric, so we are not allowed to say "yards" or "miles" in print.
Gotta be in metres (not those yankee meters!) and kilometres.
But the safety guidelines are still in imperial measure ...

[stuck]

Not as good as this one


Ken

[ChrisGreaves]

Not as good as this one

.
Why not?
Surely your example is held in low esteam?

[StuartR]

Why not?
Surely your example is held in low esteam?

If it got any lower it would be a tube train.

[stuck]

Surely your example is held in low esteam?

Au contraire mon ami, il est tenu en grande estime dans notre maison à cause de notre amour pour les trains

Ken

[ChrisGreaves]

If it got any lower it would be a tube train.

(I'm Triang to come up with a hollow response ...)

[rettingr]

I much prefer the less dangerous train wrecks