Hi Bob - once I spotted "her" closed eyes, then her face became more attractive. So definitely a female.BobH wrote:If one has normal depth perception, I think it is apparent that the images of stones covering the head, torso and legs lack the same depth definition as those surrounding it. The artist has gone to great lengths to simulate depth with shadowing, but in juxtaposition with actual objects photographed, he fails to accomplish the effect. I was with Skitterbug on identifying the figure as male, at first. On closer examination I've changed my mind.
Spoiler
I think these 2 parts of the image marked seem to outline bare female breasts cleverly painted to disguise them. Note that the lines show a rounded protrusion extending outward toward the arms. There are other clues but pointing them out might be unseemly. Besides which, virtually all of the body painting pics I've seen are of females, not males.
I'll pass by making any comments on the anatomy that you've spotted! 
