I just can't find enough information in this one.New Scientist wrote: Next up is a brain-teaser to relish from Alex Bellos’s book Can You Solve My Problems? (Guardian Faber).
Bellos recounts a peculiar situation that occurred among some foody friends: Sid Salt, Phil Pepper and Reese Relish. Bellos doesn’t tell us their genders, instead revealing that only one of them is a man. The man notices a rather amusing condimental kerfuffle: one of them has picked up the salt, another the pepper and the third the relish.
The person with the salt replies: “No one is holding the condiment that matches their surname!”
“Pass me the relish!” requests Reese.
Bellos gives us one more piece of information: the man doesn’t have the relish. Who has which condiment?
This might seem tougher than overcooked turkey, but there is enough information to find the answer. Bonus question: who is the man?
Foody Friends
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 12604
- Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 15:49
- Location: London, Europe
Foody Friends
This puzzle comes from the same New Scientist article as Handshakes, but I haven't managed to solve this one.
StuartR
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 78444
- Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 00:14
- Status: Microsoft MVP
- Location: Wageningen, The Netherlands
Re: Foody Friends
Spoiler
The person with the salt replies to the man, so the person with the salt is not a man. The man doesn't have the relish either, so the man must have the pepper.
The next hinges on the assumption that Reese doesn't speak twice in a row, otherwise there would be two different solutions.
If Reese (who asks for the relish) is not the person with the salt, Reese must be the man who has the pepper.
So Sid must be a woman and have the relish, and Phil must be a woman and have the salt.
(If we accept that Reese could speak twice in a row, Reese would have the salt and be a woman; Sid would have the pepper and be a man, and Phil would be a woman and have the relish)
The next hinges on the assumption that Reese doesn't speak twice in a row, otherwise there would be two different solutions.
If Reese (who asks for the relish) is not the person with the salt, Reese must be the man who has the pepper.
So Sid must be a woman and have the relish, and Phil must be a woman and have the salt.
(If we accept that Reese could speak twice in a row, Reese would have the salt and be a woman; Sid would have the pepper and be a man, and Phil would be a woman and have the relish)
Best wishes,
Hans
Hans
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 78444
- Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 00:14
- Status: Microsoft MVP
- Location: Wageningen, The Netherlands
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 12604
- Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 15:49
- Location: London, Europe
Re: Foody Friends
Thank you Hans, I missed the assumption that but it looks good to me
Spoiler
Reese doesn't speak twice in a row
StuartR
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 7209
- Joined: 15 Jan 2010, 22:52
- Location: Middle of England
Re: Foody Friends
I'll tell you for threepenceHansV wrote:Now where does Mac the Knife come into this?
Otherwise, brilliant reasoning as ever!
Leif
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 78444
- Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 00:14
- Status: Microsoft MVP
- Location: Wageningen, The Netherlands
Re: Foody Friends
By the way, ...
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Best wishes,
Hans
Hans
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 12604
- Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 15:49
- Location: London, Europe
-
- gamma jay
- Posts: 25455
- Joined: 17 Mar 2010, 17:33
- Location: Cape Town
Re: Foody Friends
Nice one!
Regards,
Rudi
If your absence does not affect them, your presence didn't matter.
Rudi
If your absence does not affect them, your presence didn't matter.