Why the difference

User avatar
Dave Davison
SilverLounger
Posts: 1852
Joined: 27 Jan 2010, 19:15
Location: Darlington, Co. Durham. UK

Why the difference

Post by Dave Davison »

"Not a problem, just puzzled". Today I downloaded 5 videos (discussions / Interviews) which totaled 284 minutes in length and 759 MB in size. After conversion with ConvertX the file showed the accumulative size to be 2.95 GB. Why the difference in details please? I was under the impression that ConvertX actually compressed files. Thank you Dave.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

User avatar
HansV
Administrator
Posts: 78446
Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 00:14
Status: Microsoft MVP
Location: Wageningen, The Netherlands

Re: Why the difference

Post by HansV »

What was the file format of the downloaded file(s)?
Best wishes,
Hans

User avatar
Rudi
gamma jay
Posts: 25455
Joined: 17 Mar 2010, 17:33
Location: Cape Town

Re: Why the difference

Post by Rudi »

And what is the format of the converted files? .vob, .avi?
Regards,
Rudi

If your absence does not affect them, your presence didn't matter.

User avatar
Dave Davison
SilverLounger
Posts: 1852
Joined: 27 Jan 2010, 19:15
Location: Darlington, Co. Durham. UK

Re: Why the difference

Post by Dave Davison »

Original format mp4 converted to (as shown below) Thanks Dave.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

User avatar
Rudi
gamma jay
Posts: 25455
Joined: 17 Mar 2010, 17:33
Location: Cape Town

Re: Why the difference

Post by Rudi »

MP4 is a highly compressed video format that effectively is being decompressed when converted into .VOB (This is as I understand it!)
Regards,
Rudi

If your absence does not affect them, your presence didn't matter.

User avatar
HansV
Administrator
Posts: 78446
Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 00:14
Status: Microsoft MVP
Location: Wageningen, The Netherlands

Re: Why the difference

Post by HansV »

Both .mp4 and .vob files are compressed, but they use different compression algorithms: .mp4 is based on MPEG-4, and .vob on MPEG-1 and MPEG-2. So it is quite possible that the .vob files take up more space than the original .mp4.
Best wishes,
Hans

User avatar
Dave Davison
SilverLounger
Posts: 1852
Joined: 27 Jan 2010, 19:15
Location: Darlington, Co. Durham. UK

Re: Why the difference

Post by Dave Davison »

thanks gentlemen, all very complex but slowly getting the hang of things, on this basis it seems a 4.7 GB disc should record 7.5 hours of video. Seeing that DVD's state the maximum recording time is 120 minutes what format is that assumption made on? Regards Dave.

User avatar
HansV
Administrator
Posts: 78446
Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 00:14
Status: Microsoft MVP
Location: Wageningen, The Netherlands

Re: Why the difference

Post by HansV »

It depends on the quality of the video. A 4.7 GB DVD can contain a bit more than 1 hour of high-quality, high-resolution video, or about 9 hours of VHS-quality video, or something in between...
Best wishes,
Hans

User avatar
Rudi
gamma jay
Posts: 25455
Joined: 17 Mar 2010, 17:33
Location: Cape Town

Re: Why the difference

Post by Rudi »

Is your questions based on a camcorder you have that records directly to DVD? Assuming so, the hand-guide for your camcorder will give you the specs regarding capacity, recording time and formats for various resolutions that it can deal with.
Regards,
Rudi

If your absence does not affect them, your presence didn't matter.

User avatar
Dave Davison
SilverLounger
Posts: 1852
Joined: 27 Jan 2010, 19:15
Location: Darlington, Co. Durham. UK

Re: Why the difference

Post by Dave Davison »

Thanks again, sorry if this sounds patronizing but I thank the day I some how came across this lounge, No Rudi, I don't possess a cam corder the only videos I dabble with are those mostly on You Tube. As for quality, yes I appreciate very much good visual and sound reproduction but seeing the content matter appeals to me most -and the fact that the more I can cram on to one DVD means less cost - the more hours a disc will hold the better. Cheers Dave.

User avatar
Rudi
gamma jay
Posts: 25455
Joined: 17 Mar 2010, 17:33
Location: Cape Town

Re: Why the difference

Post by Rudi »

I find it interesting that you chose to convert the videos you downloaded.
I'd keep them in the MP4 format since it has such a high compression ratio.
Regards,
Rudi

If your absence does not affect them, your presence didn't matter.

User avatar
HansV
Administrator
Posts: 78446
Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 00:14
Status: Microsoft MVP
Location: Wageningen, The Netherlands

Re: Why the difference

Post by HansV »

But conventional (stand-alone) DVD players won't play .mp4 files - the DVD standard supports MPEG-1 and MPEG-2, but not MPEG-4.
Best wishes,
Hans

User avatar
Rudi
gamma jay
Posts: 25455
Joined: 17 Mar 2010, 17:33
Location: Cape Town

Re: Why the difference

Post by Rudi »

Yes, you are correct. I never thought of that as i haven't use a DVD player in a long time... My laptop is on hand for all my entertainment needs.
Regards,
Rudi

If your absence does not affect them, your presence didn't matter.

User avatar
Dave Davison
SilverLounger
Posts: 1852
Joined: 27 Jan 2010, 19:15
Location: Darlington, Co. Durham. UK

Re: Why the difference

Post by Dave Davison »

"Why convert them?" Simply because they can then be watched by friends or family through the TV. not enough room or comfort in the tiny box room where the computer resides. Then again, if I use DVD-RW they can be used repeatedly. Cheers Dave.

User avatar
Rudi
gamma jay
Posts: 25455
Joined: 17 Mar 2010, 17:33
Location: Cape Town

Re: Why the difference

Post by Rudi »

Dave Davison wrote:"Why convert them?" Simply because they can then be watched by friends or family through the TV. not enough room or comfort in the tiny box room where the computer resides. Then again, if I use DVD-RW they can be used repeatedly. Cheers Dave.
Understood :thumbup: :cheers:
Regards,
Rudi

If your absence does not affect them, your presence didn't matter.